Why Capital Punishment Should be Banned

$19.95

Add to cart
Essay #: 055497
Total text length is 9,605 characters (approximately 6.6 pages).

Excerpts from the Paper

The beginning:
Why Capital Punishment Should be Banned
This paper explains why capital punishment should be banned. The first major theme which shall be discussed is how capital punishment, plainly and simply, is morally incompatible with an enlightened society: it involves the state killing citizens rather than seeking to rehabilitate them; in a real sense, the state becomes a murderer in its own right and degrades itself as a result. Beyond that, even when administered properly and professionally, there is growing evidence that the death penalty is inhumane and cruel: leaving aside the electric chair and gas chamber, evidence now exists that lethal injection subjects (or can subject, to be more precise) the recipient to pain and suffering that is...
The end:
.....C. (1988). Murder and capital punishment in the evolving context of the post-Furman era. Social Sciences, 66(2): 774-807.
Prellinger, E. (1990, October 29). Executions leave blood on society’s hands: when the state kills. New York Times. Retrieved November 19, 2009 from Newspaper Source Plus http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=n5h&AN=30500400&site=ehost-live
Sorensen, J., & Wrinkle, R. (1999). Capital punishment and deterrence: examining the effect of executions on murder in Texas. Crime & Delinquency, 45(4): 481-493.
Stephen, A. (2007, November 26). A stay of execution? New Statesman, 137(4872): 32-33.
Vastag, B. (2007, May 12). Lethal injection is inhumane, say researchers. Science News, 171(19): 302.