Video Games Regulation or Freedom of Speech Mutilation?


Add to cart
Essay #: 063197
Total text length is 19,990 characters (approximately 13.8 pages).

Excerpts from the Paper

The beginning:
Video Games Regulation or Freedom of Speech Mutilation?
The current debate over censorship and regulation of the movie and video game industry is a delicate yet necessary one. While no one can definitively asses or quantify the effects of pervasive violence or sexual content upon our society, clearly there is always some need for control. But where does one draw the line? Who says what is acceptable and unacceptable and how do we do this in a way that respects the current society’s sense of decency and morality while not infringing on the artist’s right to expression?
The argument that the violence seen on today’s video games is somehow significantly contributing to a rise in violent crime is over-reaching and un-based. The bulk of today’s...
The end:
.....1 S.C.R. 103.
Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. in Schenk v. U.S. (1919)
Video game Industry. Roc search 2005.
Jenkins Henry. Reality Bytes: Eight Myths about Video games debunked.
Entertainment Software Association. "Top Ten Industry Facts." 2003.
Rudon, Timothy. "Ten benefits of video games."
Congresspedia's Communications, Science and Intellectual Property Policy (U.S.) Portal
Ghaus K. Trafficking of women and children in South Asia and within Pakistan. Lahore: Dawn Printing Press; 2001.
Hayat AA. Women: victim of social evils. Karachi: Press Corporation of Pakistan; 2002.
Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Freedom of Speech. Nov 29, 2002;