The Death Penalty does not Deter Capital Murder


Add to cart
Essay #: 067966
Total text length is 9,137 characters (approximately 6.3 pages).

Excerpts from the Paper

The beginning:
The death penalty represents a divisive issue throughout the world. Individuals and groups debate about the efficacy of using the death penalty as a deterrent for people committing crimes. This paper, using journal articles, recent studies, and newspaper stories, shall argue that using the death penalty does not reduce or deter crime.
The Death Penalty does not Deter Capital Murder
The death penalty has always been a divisive issue. In 1972 the United States Supreme Court made a ruling to abolish the death penalty because it fell under the rubric of cruel and unusual punishment, and thereby violated the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments (ACLU). The Supreme Court stated that the ways in which the death penalty laws had been...
The end:
.....ue, J. and Wolfers, J (2006). The Death Penalty: No Evidence for Deterrence. Economists’ Voice, 1-6.
Dutta, S. (2002). Humans Playing God: Capital Punishment and Its Follies. Tikkun, 17(4), 17.
Kovandzic, T. V., Vieraitis, L. M., & Boots, D. (2009). Does the Death Penalty Save Lives? Criminology & Public Policy, 8(4), 803-843. doi:10.1111/j.1745-9133.2009.00596.x
Richard, W. (n.d). Death Penalty Gains Unlikely Defenders. USA Today.
Taylor Jr., S. (2001). Does the Death Penalty Save Innocent Lives? National Journal, 33(21), 1551.
Tucker, W. (2003). The Case for Retaining Capital Punishment/ Deterring Homicides with the Death Penalty. Human Events, 59(12), 18.
Van den Haag, E. (2001). The Ultimate Penalty. National Review, 53(11), 32.