Terrorism as Personality Turbulence Introduction Most conceptual analyses of terrorism employ the notion of conflict between social formations. For Huntington (11) and Barber (21), the conflict is an inter-civilizational clash of modernity versus premodernity; for Stalder (95) and others, the clash is an intra-civilizational conflict between elites and reformers. A much rarer, but perhaps far more fruitful, approach to terrorism is suggested by Rosenberg’s theory of attitude and behavior formation, in which a clash between the affective and cognitive elements of an individual’s personality might be at the root of terrorism, among other forms of violent behavior. This paper will investigate the applicability of Rosenberg’s theory to two...The end:
.....in a much more comprehensive way; future researchers could incorporate this material into their interviews with, or case studies of, terrorists. Works Cited Barber, Benjamin. Jihad vs. McWorld. New York: Ballantine Books, 1996. Bin Laden, Osama. Messages to the World. London: Verso, 2005. Harris, Eric and Dylan Klebold. Columbine Documents. Rocky Mountain News. 1999. 20 Apr. 2009 <http://denver.rockymountainnews.com/pdf/900columbinedocs.pdf>. Huntington, Samuel. The Clash of Civilizations and the Remaking of World Order. New York: Simon & Schuster, 1997. Rosenberg, Milton. Attitude Organization and Change. Charleston, SC: Greenwood, 1960. Stalder, Felix. Manuel Castells: The Theory of the Network Society. London: Polity, 2006.