Tampopo and Ohnuki-Tierney: Sound and Silence and Subtle Cultural Overtones


Add to cart
Essay #: 069167
Total text length is 5,814 characters (approximately 4.0 pages).

Excerpts from the Paper

The beginning:
Tampopo and Ohnuki-Tierney: Sound and Silence and Subtle Cultural Overtones
The following paper looks at the notorious Japanese film, “
,” and at a scholarly article that references the film by Emiko
-Tierney. In particular, this essay looks at the
-Tierney article and explores whether or not its interpretation of the cinematic work is defensible or, conversely, rather weak in areas. Essentially, the argument of
-Tierney is that the film is characterized by the use of sound to characterize irony, paradox, and the futility of one culture trying to ape the mannerisms and sensibilities of another culture. This writer tends to agree with
-Tierney insofar as sound is utilized quite cleverly to show cultural...
The end:
To close, we say that
-Tierney is correct in noting the use of sound and silence to denote cultures clashing. However, she never quite takes into account the simple fact that sound can be portrayed as both the west and as the east; there is no appreciation for the fact that
often inverts the signification of sound and silence depending upon the scene – perhaps because he wants to capture the jumbled mess that arises when people forgo their culture for someone else’s.
Works Cited
-Tierney, Emiko. “Sound versus Silence: Japanese imitation of the west.” Pp.200-202 (additional pages not provided by client).
. Dir.
. Tsutomu Yamazaki, Nobuko Miyamoto and Ken Watanabe.
Productions, 1985. Video.