Standard of Ur and Philoxenos of Eretria, Battle of Issus: A Comparative Analysis


Add to cart
Essay #: 063749
Total text length is 10,469 characters (approximately 7.2 pages).

Excerpts from the Paper

The beginning:
Standard of Ur and Philoxenos of Eretria, Battle of Issus: A Comparative Analysis
There are few constants in human history. However, one exception that may be granted is this: conflict. And as civilizations grew, that which was once minor conflict grew into the larger entity termed war. The idea of war – of clashes between great forces, controlled by individual leaders – has always darkly fascinated the human imagination. The art that has dealt with war may thus be understood as recognizing in war a terrible beauty. The analysis which follows will deal with two early attempts of articulating this terrible beauty. The first is Standard of Ur (Fig. 1); and the second is
of Eretria, Battle of Issus (Fig. 2). The two pieces will be...
The end:
Works Cited
, Margaret. “The Portraits of Alexander the Great.” Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 93.5 (1949): 373-427.
Dickenson, Bruce. “Public Transcripts Expressed in Theatres of Cruelty: The Royal Graves at Ur in Mesopotamia.” Cambridge Archaeological Journal 16 (2006): 123-44.
Frankfort, Henri. The Art and Architecture of the Ancient Orient. New York: Penguin Books, 1989.
Lloyd, Seton. The Art of the Ancient Near East. New York: Frederick A.
Inc., 1961.
, John. Art and Thought in the Hellenistic Age. London: Thames and Hudson Ltd., 1979.
of Eretria, Battle of Issus.” 330 BC. Donald Davis. Web. 2 November 2010.
“Standard of Ur.” 2600-2400 BC. The British Museum. Web. 2 November 2010.