Serial Killers: Nature or Nurture?


Add to cart
Essay #: 069219
Total text length is 7,258 characters (approximately 5.0 pages).

Excerpts from the Paper

The beginning:
Serial Killers: Nature or Nurture?
Serial killers have fascinated people for the past couple of centuries. Serial murderers like Jack the Ripper, Ted Bundy, and Aileen Wuornos loom large in the public imagination. The FBI definition of serial killer is a person who kills three or more people over a period of time (Morton Section I). But how do serial killers become the criminal deviants that they are? Is it based on their innate nature, or can it all be blamed on the way they were, or were not, nurtured as they were growing up?
The nature versus nurture debate is one that has raged on in the social sciences for centuries. The nature argument is that people are born with innate characteristics that shape their life paths. The nurture...
The end:
.....hington, DC: Federal Bureau of Investigation, U.S. Department of Justice. Web. 14 May 2011.
, Jane, James
Ashley, and Lance Hannon. “Male Serial Homicide-The Influence of Cultural and Structural Variables.” Homicide Studies 11.1 (2007): 3-14. JSTOR. Web. 14 May 2011.
, Arnold. “A Unified Theory of Development: A DialecticIntegration of Nature and Nurture. Child Development 81.1 (2010): 6-22. JSTOR. Web. 14 May 2011.
, Heather, Kathy McCloskey and Julia Ramos-
. “Theoretical Consideration of Female Sexual Predator Serial Killers in the United States.” Journal of Criminal Justice 34.3 (2006): 251-259. JSTOR. Web. 14 May 2011.