Sensationalism Revolving Around Celebrity Lawbreaking


Add to cart
Essay #: 059860
Total text length is 10,575 characters (approximately 7.3 pages).

Excerpts from the Paper

The beginning:
Sensationalism Revolving Around Celebrity Lawbreaking
Sensationalism in journalism has always occurred. Sensationalism is used to get a rise out of the viewer, to sell newspapers and to generate commotion and interest surrounding a story. Sensationalism, however, is not in the Society of Professional Journalists Code of Ethics. This set of journalistic moral standards calls for the utmost culpability and integrity when it comes to reporting the news. The Code of Ethics tells journalists to seek truth and report it, minimize harm, act independently and be accountable. Unfortunately, this is not often the case in many news communications. Throughout history, many journalists deal with sensationalism differently, especially surrounding high...
The end:
.....communication of information really is.
Works Cited
Ayres, Drummond B. “Back on the Stand, Simpson Again
Denies Role in 2 Killings.” The New York Times. 14 January 1997. A10: Web.
“Code of Ethics” Society of Professional Journalists. Society of Professional Journalists, 2009. Web. 20 Feb 2010.
Freeman, Dennis. “A Wakeup Call for Kobe.” Los Angeles Sentinel 24 July 2003. AI: Web.
“Kingswood Murder: Trial of Franz” The Manchester Guardian. 7 August 1861. Pg. 3: Web.
Markels, Alex & Wise, Mike. “Bryant Case Puts a County in the Spotlight.” New York Times 20 July 2003. SP4: Web.
“News Items.” Hartford Daily Courant. 20 August 1859. Pg 2: Web.
Smith, Andrea Duval. “Making a Killing in the Bookshops.” The Guardian. 20 August 1994. Pg 25: Web.