Russell Williams and Moral Disengagement Theory Introduction The case of Russell Williams was one of the most important criminal cases in 2010. What was interesting was that Williams appeared to be two different people. On the one hand many people described him as a highly moral and decent individual. For example, a former military officer who worked under Williams said of Williams, “He was funny, he liked to laugh and was beloved by everyone in the squadron, definitely someone often described as a nice guy”(Blatchford,2011,p.A.6). However, this was countered by his violent crimes. In “Williams case took toll on media; The ex-colonel's evidence stunned everyone in the courtroom, says Meghan Hurley” it is stated, “Williams pleaded guilty to...The end:
.....f moral conflict. References Bandura, A.(1999).Moral Disengagement in the Perpetration of Inhumanities. Personality and Social Psychology Review 3: 193-209. Blatchford , Christie(2011, Mar.30)Russell Williams. The Globe and Mail: p.A.6 CTV News(2011, Mar.29). Williams. CTV NEWS. Jimerson , Shane R(2010)Handbook of Bullying. Taylor and Francis. Loriggio , Paolo(2011, Mar.29) Child porn found on Russell Williams' computer, but no charges laid: book; Williams' dark side took over, author says. The Canadian Press. Ottawa Citizen(2010, Dec.31) Williams case took toll on media; The ex-colonel's evidence stunned everyone in the courtroom, says Meghan Hurley. The Ottawa Citizen: p.D.9 Rhode, Deborah L(2006)Moral Leadership. John Wiley and Sons LTD.