Rationalism and Empiricism: A Comparison


Add to cart
Essay #: 072291
Total text length is 4,822 characters (approximately 3.3 pages).

Excerpts from the Paper

The beginning:
Rationalism and Empiricism: A Comparison
As a general rule, Rationalists believe that the Human Race is endowed with certain knowledge, ideas and concepts that are independent of experiential events in an individual life. Empiricists, on the other hand, believe that all knowledge comes from experience and observation and that God and/or evolution does not grant endowments of unearned or unlearned knowledge. Finding examples of individuals who believe strictly in either Rationalism or Empiricism is rather difficult. There is quite a bit of overlap and most people, who have thought about the matter, have inclinations that are a combination of the two, depending on the question.
At the crux of the argument is the question of where ideas come...
The end:
In other words, ambiguities are present regardless of classification. Philosophers may argue about where thought, or the capacity for reasoning comes from, but these are complicated issues, not likely to be resolved soon.
Works Cited
Descartes, Rene. Meditations, in Descartes: Selected Philosophical Writings. Translated by John Cottingham, Robert Stoothoff and Dugald Murdoch. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1988. Print.
Leinbiz, Gottfried. New Essays on Human Understanding, in Leinbiz: Philosophical Writings. Edited by G.H.R. Parkinson. Translated by Mary Morris and G.H.R. Parkinson, London: J.M. Dent & Sons, 1973. Print.
Locke, John. An Essay on Human Understanding. Edited by Roger Woolhouse. London: Penguin Books, 1997. Print.