Ontario Human Rights Commission Appeal Factum

$19.95

Add to cart
Essay #: 059021
Total text length is 15,078 characters (approximately 10.4 pages).

Excerpts from the Paper

The beginning:
Ontario Human Rights Commission Appeal Factum
II. Facts
A Toronto bar establishment catered to a largely Danish clientele. In catering to their usual customers also refused to serve customers with Norwegian last names. The bar cited a loophole in Ontario Human Rights Code based their discriminatory conduct was not prohibited by the code. A customer was denied service by the Toronto bar because he had a Norwegian last name and appealed to the Ontario Human Rights Commission for redress. The Ontario Human Rights Commission fined the Toronto bar for violation of the Ontario Human Rights Code. The Toronto bar sought judicial review of the fine imposed by the Ontario Human Rights Commission and the Ontario Superior Court set aside the fine...
The end:
.....man Resources Development), 2004 SCC 65, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 357
Ontario Human Rights Code.
R. v. Akeelah, 2008 ONCJ 279
University of British Columbia v. Berg, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 353
Works Cited
Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. 29 March 1982. Department of Justice Canada. 30 March 2010. <http://laws.justice.gc.ca/en/charter/1.html>
Gay Alliance Toward Equality v. Vancouver Sun, [1979] 2 S.C.R. 435
Hodge v. Canada (Minister of Human Resources Development), 2004 SCC 65, [2004] 3 S.C.R. 357
Ontario Human Rights Code. (15 December 2009). www.e-laws.gov.on.ca. 30 March 2010. http://www.e-laws.gov.on.ca/html/statutes/english/elaws_statutes_90h19_e.htm
R. v. Akeelah, 2008 ONCJ 279
University of British Columbia v. Berg, [1993] 2 S.C.R. 353