Is Human Cloning Morally Permissible or Not, and Why?


Add to cart
Essay #: 073332
Total text length is 11,044 characters (approximately 7.6 pages).

Excerpts from the Paper

The beginning:
Is Human Cloning Morally Permissible or Not, and Why?
We are repelled by the prospect of cloning human beings not because of the strangeness or the novelty of the undertaking, but because we intuit and we feel, immediately and without argument, the violation of things that we rightfully hold dear (Kass).
In 1997 a sheep named Dolly became the first higher mammal to be cloned. This event led to worldwide discussion on the morality of cloning. The above statement by Leon Kass represents the opinion of many people worldwide. While, as Dolly illustrates, the technology now exists for human cloning, the practice has been widely condemned. There are some, like John Harris however who challenge the conventional reasoning of Kass and others. In...
The end:
.....Catholic News Service. “Criticism of cloning mounts.” (23 January 1998). National Catholic Reporter. (20 December 2011).
Harris, John. "’Goodbye Dolly?’ The Ethics of Human Cloning.” Journal of Medical Ethics, (23)6, 353-360. (December 1997).<>
Macklin, Ruth. “Artificial means of reproduction and our understanding of the family.” Hastings Center Report (21)1 (January/February 1991).
, Leon. “Preventing a Brave New World.” The New Republic Online (21 June 2001). (20 December 2011). <>
Smith, Simon. “The Benefits of Human Cloning.” (2002). (20 December 2011). <>