How Neoliberalism and Globalization Re-Enslaved Sierra Leone


Add to cart
Essay #: 061378
Total text length is 14,116 characters (approximately 9.7 pages).

Excerpts from the Paper

The beginning:
How Neoliberalism and Globalization Re-Enslaved Sierra Leone
There is a war of words surrounding the concepts and practices of neoliberalism and globalization, which are close enough in meaning to be synonymous. Ritzer provides an overview of the traditional definition of neoliberalism, which highlights its positive and egalitarian aspects:
Under neo-liberalism, the operation of free markets is considered to be crucial. It emphasizes a commitment to deregulation of the markets. Free markets are also portrayed as intrinsically linked to a democratic political system that facilitates individual economic well-being... neo-liberalism has modified the functioning of the state in order to facilitate the functioning of the market....
The end:
.....lan, 1948.
Reno, William. “Economic Reform and the Strange Case of ‘Liberalization’ in Sierra Leone.” Governance (1993) 6:1, 23-42.
Reno, William. “Ironies of Post-Cold War Structural Adjustment in Sierra Leone.” Review of African Political Economy (1996) 23:67, 7-18.
Shiva, Vandana. “Poverty and Globalization.” Class material.
Silberfein, Marilyn. “The geopolitics of conflict and diamonds in Sierra Leone.” Geopolitics (2004) 9:1, 213-241.
Snyder, Richard. Politics after Neoliberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2001.
UNDP. Human Development Report 1999. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Williams, Paul. “Fighting for Freetown: British Military Intervention in Sierra Leone.” Contemporary Security Policy (2001) 22:3, 140-168.