Federal Regulation of Marriage: A Study in Contradictions With laws for and against same-sex marriage becoming so prevalent on the national scene in recent years, there has been much confusion, and on the part of congress, dictation on morals as to what constitutes “marriage” for purposes of federal law. Many state and federal regulations rely on a State definition of marriage for purposes of conferring rights and benefits to citizens. As promulgated, these regulations have a long-standing constitutional and jurisprudential basis. Such regulations were enacted to protect the spouses of accident victims, veterans, employees, and retirees. Congress, however, in enacting a federal definition of marriage in contradiction of these regulations,...The end:
.....7. Hayes, N. (1996). Note: married filing jointly: federal recognition of same-sex marriages under the internal revenue code. Hastings Law Journal Vol. 57, p. 1593. Rep. Abercrombie Statement. (1996, Jul. 11). 142 Congressional Record Daily H7449. Rep. Moran Statement. (1996, Jul. 12). 142 Congressional Record Daily H7489 Rep. Nadler Statement. (1996, Jul. 11). 142 Congressional Record Daily H7446. Sen. Feingold Statement. (1996, Sep. 10). 142 Congressional Record Daily S10120. Urbina, I. (2010, Mar. 3). Gay marriage is legal in U.S. capital. The New York Times. U.S. House Committee on the Judiciary. (1996). Defense of Marriage Act: Report together with Dissenting Views (to accompany H.R. 3396), 104th Cong., 2d sess., 1996, H. Rep. 104-664.