Faust’s Observations and Argument on the Transformation of Early Israel


Add to cart
Essay #: 072292
Total text length is 8,601 characters (approximately 5.9 pages).

Excerpts from the Paper

The beginning:
Faust’s Observations and Argument of the Transformation of Early Israel: Importance of the Surviving Views amid Refutation
Igniting a veritable firestorm of criticism in his attempt to establish new perspectives which explain migratory patterns from the highland regions to urban areas of Israel,
Faust nevertheless furthers scholarship in this area by inviting new perspectives on a subject which many argue has been determined. While Faust may in fact be erroneous in his evaluation of the reasons for the migration of the Iron Age populations, he nevertheless extends dialogue which can only help to add precision in understanding a formative issue in Near Eastern Archaeology. Similarly important in his refutation of Faust, Israel...
The end:
.....as clearly evidenced. Truthfully, this may not be possible, and without the accompanying text, the views of Faust remain as
indicated: “dust thrown into the air” (14).
Works Cited
"Abandonment, urbanization, resettlement and the formation of the Israelite state."
Near Eastern Archaeology 66 .4 (2003): 147-161. Print.
Finkelstein, Israel. "Finkelstein, [De
of the Israelite State: A Rejoinder on Methodology, ." Near Eastern Archaeology 68(2005): 202-208. Print.
, Lester
"What Historians Would like to Know
... ."
Near Eastern Archaeology 70.1 (2007): 13-15. Print.
, Alex.
"On the Case of Faust versus Finkelstein, from a Friend of the Court."
Near Eastern Archaeology 70.1 (2007): 16-20. Print.