Comparing the employment insurance act in Canada to the OECD policies: How Canada is falling short From the start, it is clear that the OECD believes Canada is doing a poor job at throttling persistent underemployment and unemployment; specifically, the OECD feels that, in opposition to its own policies, Canada is simply not “encouraging” people to leave EI by tightening requirements and eligibility sufficiently. With that in mind, the paper looks at how the Canadian government is pursuing imprecise training policies – specifically ones that compel people to receive training if they wish to receive unemployment insurance – that conveniently overlook the fact that most jobs being created in the economy are low-paying service sector jobs...The end:
....., & Wareham, J. (1993). Technological change and shifting labour requirements. In G.S. Lowe & H.J. Krahn (eds.), Work in Canada: Readings in the sociology of work and industry, (pp.315-326). Scarborough: Nelson Canada. Service Canada. (2007). Current employment insurance act. Retrieved July 4, 2009 from http://www.servicecanada.gc.ca/eng/ei/legislation/eia_e.pdf Shields, J. (1996). Flexible work, labour market polarization, and the politics of skills training and enhancement. In T. Dunk, S. McBride & R.W. Nelson (eds.), The Training Trap: Ideology, training and the labour market, (pp.53-72). Halifax: Fernwood Publishing. Taylor, M.C. (1995). What makes a successful workplace education program? Adult Basic Education, 5(1): 37-52.