Argument and Inquiry: Geoengineering


Add to cart
Essay #: 061503
Total text length is 8,113 characters (approximately 5.6 pages).

Excerpts from the Paper

The beginning:
Argument and Inquiry: Geoengineering
Opinion and Reasoning
It is clear that the governments of the world must take action on global warming, but what is the best course of action to take? There are a number of different processes available which will lower our impact on the environment and also address our current rising temperatures. Some of these are better than others. It is my opinion that the use of geoengineering, which is the creation of “deliberate large-scale intervention in the Earth’s climate system, in order to moderate global warming,” (The Royal Society ix), created by scientific methods rather than social changes, should be a last resort.
I believe that in order to lessen the impact of global warming, we need to change our...
The end:
.....06): 539–577.
International Energy Agency. Agency Website. Retrieved 12 July
2010 from
Nordhaus, W. The Challenge of Global Warming: Economic Models
and Environmental Policy. New Haven CT: Yale University Press, 2007.
Olson, B. "Big Ideas for Saving the Earth." The Futurist, July-
August (2009): 51-53.
Raul, D. Personal Interview over E-mail 10 July 2010.
Robock, A., Marquardt, A., Kravitz, B. and Stenchikov, G.
"Benefits, risks, and costs of stratospheric geoengineering." Geophysical Research Letters 36 (2009): 1-9.
The Royal Society. Geoengineering the climate: science,
governance and uncertainty. RS Policy document 10/09. London: The Royal Society, 2009.