A Speech on three case studies Case one The facts of the case. The facts of the case are these: Sam and Brad have two children from in vitro fertilization; they are disputing the wisdom of donating their remaining frozen embryonic stem cells to stem cell research facilities: Brad thinks it is abhorrent because “babies” are being destroyed to make possible stem cell research (those stem cells are embryonic babies, after all, and this upsets Brad) whereas Sam thinks that donating the cells is a good thing because it can help many good causes and because those stem cells are simply lying there, frozen, and will never become children anyway. Solutions to the problem. This is a tough question to address. For some people – and for some...The end:
..... 1996. 31 May 2009 http://www.tri-cityherald.com/1211/story/136426.html Lenoir, Noelle. “Europe confronts the embryonic stem cell research challenge.” Science, 25 Feb. 2000: 1425-1427. National Institutes of Health. “What are adult stem cells?” Stem Cell information. 21 Apr. 2009. NIH. 31 May 2009 http://stemcells.nih.gov/info/basics/basics4.asp “New instrumentation probes for trace chemicals in animal poisoning incidents.” Dog World, 85.4 (2000): 60-61. Shaffer, G.D. “Nanticoke Indian burial practices: challenges for archaeological interpretation.” Archaeology of Eastern North America, 33(2005): 141-162. Weiss, Elizabeth. “Kennewick Man’s funeral: the burying of scientific evidence.” Politics & the Life Sciences, 20.1 (2001): 13-18.