A Review of Two Criminal Case Studies

$19.95

Add to cart
Essay #: 072184
Total text length is 5,526 characters (approximately 3.8 pages).

Excerpts from the Paper

The beginning:
A Review of Two Criminal Case Studies
Case 1: the case of Bill (with a look at the criminal liability of each person with discussion of
mens
rea
and
actus
rea
)
Charges that might be laid. Bill is guilty of manslaughter and criminal negligence causing death – and assault causing death; after all, Bill did lay hands upon Mike and did throw him to the.
The cab-driver is plainly guilty of criminal negligence, too, because he should have known that cleaning a hunting rifle that happens to have shells in it, whilst in a bustling environment, is a prescription for tragedy. Both Bill and the cab driver are guilty of criminal negligence under section 219(1) of the Canadian Criminal Code (
Rouben
, 2009).
Persons against whom charges may be laid....
The end:
..... his own negligence and did nothing to help the child; and
Flintwich
likewise created a difficult situation by not dealing with the holes (he was not present when Tim drowned, of course).
Works Cited
Bogoroch
, R.M & chandler, T. (2002). How Canadian courts have turned thin skull damages into crumbling skull damages. Canadian Institute. Retrieved November 12, 2011 from http://www.bogoroch.com/articles/thinskull.pdf
R. v. Miller [1983] 2 AC 176
R v
Pittwood
(1902) 19 TLR 37
Rouben
, A. (2009, October). The attorney general and the cyclist. Retrieved November 10, 2011 from http://allanrouben.com/blog/tag/criminal-negligence-causing-death/
Slapper, G. (2007). The changing contours of the criminal law. Journal of Criminal Law, 71(2): 95-98.