FREE ESSAY ON PYGMALION ACT IIII

PYGMALION ACT IIII

The trio return to Higgins' Wimpole Street laboratory, exhausted from the night's
happenings. They talk about the evening and their great success, though Higgins seems
rather bored, more concerned with his inability to find slippers. While he talks
absentmindedly with Pickering, Eliza slips out, returns with his slippers, and lays them
on
the floor before him without a word. When he notices them, he thinks that they appeared
out of nowhere. Higgins and Pickering begin to speak as if Eliza is not there with them,
saying how happy they are that the entire experiment is over, agreeing that it had
become
rather boring in the last few months. The two of them then leave the room to go to bed.
Eliza is clearly hurt (Eliza's beauty turns murderous, say the stage directions), but
Higgins and Pickering are oblivious to her.
Higgins pops back in, once again mystified over what he has done with his
slippers, and Eliza promptly flings them in his face. Eliza is mad enough to kill him;
she
thinks that she is no more important to him than his slippers. At Higgins' retort that
she is
presumptuous and ungrateful, she answers that no one has treated her badly, but that she
is still left confused about what is to happen to her now that the bet has been won.
Higgins
says that she can always get married or open that flower shop (both of which she
eventually does), but she replies by saying that she wishes she had been left where she
was
before. She goes on to ask whether her clothes belong to her, meaning what can she take
away with her without being accused of thievery. Higgins is genuinely hurt, something
that
does not happen to him often. She returns him a ring he bought for her, but he throws it
into the fireplace. After he leaves, she finds it again, but then leaves it on the
dessert stand
and departs.
If we consider the conventional structure of a romance or fairy tale, the story has
really already reached its climax by this point, because Cinderella has been turned into
a
princess, and the challenge has been met. Then why does the play carry on for another
two
acts? This would appear completely counter- productive, only if one thinks that this play
is
only about changing appearances. The fact that the play carries on indicates that there
are
more transformations in Eliza to be witnessed: this act shows the birth of an
independent
spirit in the face of Higgins' bullying superiority. The loosely set-up dichotomy
between
people and objects (i.e., whether Higgins treats people like people or objects) is
brought
to a head when Eliza flings his slippers in his face, and complains that she means no
more
to him than his slippers--You don't care. I know you don't care. You wouldn't care if I
was dead. I'm nothing to you--not so much as them slippers. Not only does she object to
being treated like an object, she goes on to assert herself by saying that she would
never
sell herself, like Higgins suggests when he tells her she can go get married. This
climactic
move forces Higgins to reconsider what a woman can be, and, as he confesses in the final
act, marks the beginning of his considering Eliza to be an equal rather than a burden.
One thing to consider in this act is why Shaw has chosen not to portray the climax
at the ambassador's party where Eliza can prove how well she has been instructed by
Higgins (although his movie screenplay does allow for a scene at the embassy). One
reason is that most theatrical productions do not have the capacity to stage an opulent,
luxurious ball just for a short scene. But another reason is that Shaw's intention is to
rob
the story of its romance. We are spared the actual training of Eliza as well as her
moment
of glory (that is, both the science and the magic); instead, all we get is scenes of her
pre-
and post- the dramatic climax.