Free Essays, Free Research Papers, Free Book Reports and Free Term Papers
Essay Express Free Essays, Free Research Papers,
Free Book Reports and Free Term Papers

FREE ESSAY ON HEMINGWAY: THE SHORT HAPPY LIFE OF FRANCIS MACOMBER

College Term Papers - Instant Download

(sponsored links)

"The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber"
An analysis of "The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber" by Ernest Hemingway. -- 1,721 words;

"The Short Happy Life"
A look at the argument that Francis Macomber was not intentionally killed by his wife, Margaret Macomber, in the short story, "The Short Happy Life", by Ernest Hemingway. -- 889 words; MLA

Hemingway's Short Stories
A look at some of Ernest Hemingway's short stories and how they give insight into the human condition. -- 1,237 words; MLA

Ernest Hemingway's Short Stories
Analysis of the character, Nick Adams, in Hemingway's short stories, “Indian Camp” and “Big Two-Hearted River, Parts 1 and 2” . -- 1,138 words; APA

Macomber - The Coward
An analysis of the character in Ernest Hemingway’s short story “The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber”. -- 2,985 words; APA

Click here for more essays on HEMINGWAY: THE SHORT HAPPY LIFE OF FRANCIS MACOMBER

HEMINGWAY: THE SHORT HAPPY LIFE OF FRANCIS MACOMBER

Ernest Hemingway was one of a group of artists in the inter-war period of the early
twentieth century who was left mentally (and for Hemingway also physically) scarred by
the total devastation he witnessed during and after the Great War. Gertrude Stein labeled
Hemingway and his peers a Lost Generation, a famous phrase that only partially describes
the detachment, confusion, instability, and distrust that these twenty- and
thirty-somethings felt toward many of the traditional ways of life that had led to the
brutal, total war which had eradicated much of the people of their age group. To cope
with the feelings of meaninglessness and nothingness they had in their lives in the
modern world, these artists developed personalized value systems which were reflected and
transmitted through their work.
Hemingway's personal value system has been termed the code, and has to do mainly with
struggle and growth toward awareness as a process taught via example by a tutor figure to
a student figure, the tyro. The tutor figure is what critics call the code-hero, and his
stoic tutelage is usually manifested in some manner of 'birth under fire' to the tyro,
who is often only a shell of a human, a corrupted soul, and is virtually the 'living
dead'. Through the tutor's example, the tyro can struggle toward an awareness of nada,
the term for the omnipresent void of modern life, and through confronting nada perhaps
win back his life from moral and emotional bankruptcy. The tutor teaches the tyro how to
cope with nada. This essay will examine Hemingway's code and how it confronts nada as it
is played out in one of his most exemplary tutor-tyro duos, Wilson and Francis in The
Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber.
Understanding Hemingway's common structural figures will help to illuminate the action in
the story as well as the process of Wilson's tutelage and Francis' growth. One structure
in The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber is that of an inner journey for Francis. As
Grebstein suggests, Francis, like other Hemingway tyros, moves from innocence to
suffering to awareness. 1 With awareness, at least in Francis' case, comes action as
well. The other main structure in the story is more abstract and theoretical but equally
as evident as the first, namely that of an arch pattern relating to place and spheres of
action. This structural pattern, which will be analyzed in conjunction with the former
structure, is a progression from outside to inside to outside. 2
Francis Macomber begins the story with a skewed type of innocence that is common in
Hemingway's writing. His innocence is not so much of a lack of experience but a lack of
valuable, dignified, real experience, leaving Francis with years of memories but none
which he can use to improve his personal character. 3 That is to say that Francis has led
a 'sheltered life', one where he has been protected from making difficult decisions by
the barriers and buffers of his wealth, his marriage and his status, which in true
Hemingway fashion are all represented more or less by one unifying entity: Francis' wife
Margot. 
In the story, Margot is the personification of the forces of nada. All the things Francis
has cherished and which have (unbeknownst to him) made his life so meaningless thus far,
are the same things which Margot and he share, and further, are the things which Francis
will have to reject and de-value in order to face the wounded big game on the hunt, in
order to confront fear and nada. Implicit in that statement is the assertion that Francis
must reject Margot (his personal marriage to nada) in order to start to live, and
conversely that by loosening her grip on him, Francis also loosens the grip of
nothingness, of nada, on himself. Of course, Francis does not know any of the above early
on in the story, and even for a while after the wounded lion incident; he is still in a
state of unaware innocence, or naivete, and it will take prompting from the tutor
character, Wilson, to enable Francis to struggle toward a break with Margot and more
importantly, with nada. 
Like Harry in The Snows of Kilimanjaro (who also comes to a realization that he must
reject the woman he is with and her world in order to be real), Francis has lived a life
of ease saturated by alcohol, surrounded by morally bankrupt men and especially women,
and obsessed with material gains over honest experience. So, for instance, when the news
of Francis' cowardice has spread around the camp and Wilson has been forced to threaten
to whip one of the servant boys for talking about Francis, Francis cannot understand why
the boys would rather submit to lashings than lose their pay; Francis simply cannot
comprehend that for the boys the body is expendable while their meager wages are not. 4
Francis would expect either to buy his way out of the lashings or to take the monetary
loss simply because he can afford to -- the threat of pain is real and frightful for
Francis but the loss of mere money does not bother him in the least because he has so
much money he no longer understands its value. Indeed, the safari Francis is on in the
story is at first little more than a bought African adventure, a fashionable act of the
day popularized by the mythology surrounding Theodore Roosevelt's safaris and the tales
of the great white hunters. 5 Francis goes expecting the safari, like everything else he
has done so far in his existence, to be easy. He does not expect danger or the personal
growth he will undergo, but merely an anecdote to put him one up at the next cocktail
party. Thus, back at camp after his cowardly dash out of the tall grass away from the
wounded lion Francis tries to ensure that his societal image will not be harmed by news
of his cowardice leaking out. He snivels to Wilson, I'm awfully sorry about that lion
business. It doesn't have to go any further, does it? I mean, no one will hear about it,
will they? 6 It is at this point in the story that Wilson loses all respect for Francis:
So he's a bloody four-letter man as well as a bloody coward, he thought. I rather liked
him until today. 7 
Francis' innocence, as far as the action in the story itself, is manifested in his
cowardly run from the wounded lion, an event that occurs outside in the realm of the
white hunter, Wilson. Following Hemingway's arch structure, the story next moves to an
interior location, inside Francis' mind, where he struggles to come to terms with his
cowardice, his wasted life, and nada. Having lost the respect of Wilson, whatever if any
remained of Margot's, and everyone else's in the hunting party, Francis enters a
difficult, gut-wrenching period of self-assessment. This part of the story, in which
Francis replays the entire wounded lion incident in his head and begins to grapple with
the root causes of his cowardice and meaninglessness, is the suffering step of Francis'
personal journey. External factors like the fact that Wilson and Margot have sex only
meters away from him on the night of his greatest failure only serve to illuminate for
Francis how utterly devoid of meaning his traditional ways have been. Margot shows she
does not care at all about Francis; indeed, she is nothing (nada) to him. Instead of
consoling Francis, she sneaks out of their tent to be with Wilson, putting herself and
her chance for exotic glamour first and foremost, because the women of the international,
fast, sporting set . . . did not feel they were getting their money's worth unless they
had shared the cot with the white hunter. 8
Wilson maintains a cool detachment from the entire situation as Francis struggles to
better himself through painful self-criticism. The night with Margot is nothing more than
a windfall to Wilson, and he has no sympathy for the irritated Francis the next morning:
Why doesn't he keep his wife where she belongs? What does he think I am, a bloody plaster
saint? Let him keep her where she belongs. It's his own fault. 9 Wilson has already
decided that the rest of the Macomber safari will be one where he is still drinking their
whisky, or going through the motions because he has been hired even if there is nothing
in it of value for him any longer. 10
It is important to note that as is the case with most of Hemingway's tutors, as a
professional Wilson has a limited realm of understanding. As Rovit argues, a tutor
character's responses will be inevitably adequate to the challenge that he is trained to
accept . . . The tyro must try to stop himself from thinking [in those same situations if
he is to act as determinedly as the tutor]. 11 Thus Wilson can offer Francis plenty of
sound advice on big game hunting (Wilson's area of expertise), but in other areas his
advice is detached and dismissive: Women upset amounts to nothing. Strain on the nerves
and one thing'n another. 12 That is to say that Wilson's tutelage will only directly
apply to hunting, and Francis will have to apply the lessons to the other areas of his
life in order for the lessons to have a pronounced effect on the rest of his life. 
Early on in the safari Wilson tried to teach Francis the honorable way to hunt using the
African concept of shauri, which best translates to duty. When Macomber asks why the
wounded lion cannot just be left to die, Wilson answers, For one thing, he's certain to
be suffering. For another, some one else might run onto him. 13 Wilson explains that it
is the hunting party's shauri to go into the grass after the wounded lion, for the safety
of other humans and for the well-being and dignity of the animal. When Macomber bolts
from the grass, he not only shows his cowardice, he also neglects his shauri.
That said, there are numerous incidents where Wilson is baffled by Francis' relative
resolve to keep trying, and they are crucial to understanding the underlying tutor-tyro
relationship in the story. For instance, back at camp after Francis has asked Wilson to
keep the lion incident a secret, Francis optimistically says, Maybe I can fix it up on
the buffalo. We're after them next, aren't we? 14 At this, Wilson questions the grounds
for his loss of respect for Macomber and is momentarily all for Macomber again. Yet
Wilson cannot forget the morning and so he returns to disrespect for Francis, though he
does quietly warn Francis that his wife is approaching: Here comes the Memsahib. 15 This
line is used twice in the story, in situations where Wilson and Francis are intimately
discussing the hunt and where Wilson feels a woman's presence is problematic and
unnecessary: prior to the lion hunt when the tutor and tyro discuss the proper range to
take a lion at 16, and in the aftermath of Francis' cowardice as they attempt to patch up
their badly slipping relationship. 17 Even though he does not respect Francis at the
latter point, Wilson realizes that it will not help matters any if Margot is let in on
the relationship's secret confidances.
Therefore, late in the afternoon after the lion hunt, Wilson and Francis go out together
without Margot to hunt a herd of impala, animals that Francis is with good reason less
fearful of. This small sequence is another crucial tutor-tyro moment, as Wilson nurtures
the wounded ego of Francis. After Francis fells a ram with a very creditable shot Wilson
compliments Francis' shooting and states, You shoot like that and you'll have no trouble.
Francis again displays his willingness to make up for his cowardice with the lion, asking
if there will be buffalo the next day and stating, I'd like to clear away that lion
business. 18 Although he still very much resents Macomber's lack of backbone earlier in
the day, Wilson offers kind words to his shaky tyro: I wouldn't think about that any
more. Any one could be upset by his first lion. That's all over. 19 Neither of the
characters fully believe the sentiment, but Wilson shows some compassion or empathy in
deciding to say anything at all. 
Soon thereafter through his internal suffering Francis arrives at the conclusion that the
only way he will reclaim his life from nada is to prove himself on the hunt. The morning
of the buffalo hunt (the morning after the lion incident and Margot's latest affair),
Francis finds that, of all the many men that he had hated, he hated Robert Wilson the
most. 20 The hatred Francis feels toward Wilson is not really hatred, but rather a type
of jealousy and envy. Wilson, after all, was not afraid of the wounded lion and carried
on his shauri without cowardice. Wilson, too, reaped the rewards of the hunt, in Margot's
affection, which is the hard physical turning point for Francis; after Margot has proven
her meaninglessness to Francis, he has no choice but to go on in the abysmal grasp of
Margot or to make an effort to change everything about himself. Francis sees in Wilson
what he would like to become, a man who can control the outcome of events that should be
beyond his control, a man who acts to ensure that he is not a victim, a man in charge of
his own life. The morning after the lion incident Wilson is everything Francis, through
the course of his suffering self-assessment that night, has decided to become. Thus it is
no surprise that Francis is eager to go out the next morning and prove to everyone,
including himself, that he is a changed man: You're sure you [Wilson] wouldn't like to
stay in camp with her yourself and let me go out and hunt the buffalo? 21 His eagerness
is foolish but it serves his purpose: Francis displays his brash new attitude, rejects
Margot's attempts to calm him (i.e., to control him) and issues a challenge to Wilson, in
essence implying, I'm not afraid to go after the big game. You just try and keep up with
(the new) me.
At this point Francis' emotions are very complex. In his intensified state, eager to
prove himself, he would surely be mauled out on the plain: too much testosterone, too
little training and tact. Again it must be noted that Francis' hatred is tinged with
heavy envy and resentment of Wilson. Francis is so simultaneously ashamed (of his
cowardice's resonance both in camp and in his head) and invigorated (by his self-induced
growth and eagerness to act upon the fruit of his suffering) that outwardly he acts
infuriated, telling Margot, I hate the red-faced swine. I loathe the sight of [Wilson]
while on the inside somewhere he knows he will need Wilson's guidance and hunting
expertise. 22 Thus, when Wilson pulls up in the car to go out after the buffalo, Francis
is forthright, self-assured, and positively with Wilson 23:
Going shooting? he asked.
Yes, said Macomber, standing up. Yes. (italics added). 
For the conclusion of the story and of Francis' personal journey, the point where Francis
reaches awareness, the action is once again outside, thus completing the structural arch.
At first Wilson is weary of hunting buffalo with Francis, but once the buffalo are
spotted Wilson sees a kindred spirit in Francis. As the tutor and tyro become partners
racing across the plain after the three water buffaloes, Wilson remains a stern tutor and
Francis continues to resent Wilson's relative perfection 24:
[Francis] was raising his rifle when Wilson shouted, Not from the car, you fool! and he
had no fear, only hatred of Wilson . . . 
After the buffalo have been downed, the change in Francis, his newfound awareness and
self-control, are somewhat apparent to everyone. Macomber feels a drunken elation and In
his life he had never felt so good. 25 Margot, realizing she is losing her grip on
Francis, tries to de-value the experience, saying, It seemed very unfair to me . . .
chasing those big helpless things in a motor car. 26 Wilson commends Francis: I was just
mopping up a little. You shot damn well. Suddenly, Francis has no hatred of Wilson, that
anger replaced by a type of camaraderie: Let's all have a drink. 27 
Of course, nada is not this easy to shake. As they celebrate, news arrives that the first
bull, ironically the only one Macomber took single-handedly, has only been wounded and
has escaped into the bush. Hemingway skillfully sets the stage for a test of Francis'
growth. Margot, who has not grown, says, Then it's going to be just like the lion. 28
Showing his newfound respect for Francis, Wilson snaps, It's not going to be a damned bit
like the lion. and turning to Francis asks, Would you like another drink, Macomber?. 29
Precisely at this point, Francis feels the change in himself 30:
He expected the feeling he had had about the lion to come back but it did not. For the
first time in his life he really felt wholly without fear. Instead of fear he had a
feeling of definite elation. 
Francis wastes no time in telling Wilson and Margot of his newfound lack of fear, saying,
I don't think I'd ever be afraid of anything again. Something happened in me after we
first saw the buff and started after him. Like a dam bursting. It was pure excitement.
After a few lines Francis says, I feel absolutely different. and a moment later he
expresses his utter confidence: You know, I'd like to try another lion. I'm not really
afraid of them now. After all, what can they do to you? 31 Wilson is so impressed with
Francis' change that he recites a Shakespeare quotation which has served as a motto for
him, something Wilson never would have revealed about himself had he not found a kindred
spirit in Francis. Hemingway gives a half page of Wilson's thoughts on the growth and
change of Macomber, of which these lines are key excerpts 32:
Beggar had probably been afraid all his life. Don't know what started it. But over now.
Hadn't had time to be afraid with the buff. That and being angry too . . . Fear gone like
an operation. Something else grew in its place. Main thing a man had. Made him into a
man. Women knew it too. No bloody fear. 
Meanwhile, throughout Francis' ecstatic celebration of his newfound control of his life,
and as Wilson admires Francis' impressive hunting action, Margot is icily quiet, only
expressing her disgust at the hunt. She too has seen the change in Francis, and it
worries her, for she is losing control of him: Her contempt was not secure. She was very
afraid of something. 33 In an essential passage, the frightened Margot confronts Francis
about his sudden bravery: Isn't it too late? she asks. He responds, Not for me,
expressing that only now in the last few moments has he had any control in the entirety
of his life. 34 
Just as Harry in The Snows of Kilimanjaro decides to pick up his pen and write again in
order to combat the surrounding nada, Francis picks up his gun and decides to act upon
the awareness he has gained during his personal journey from sheltered innocence through
self-assessing suffering to a singular confrontation with nada. It is part of Francis'
shauri as a hunter to finish what he has started with the buffalo; Wilson taught him that
with the lion but it took the painful realizations Francis had overnight and the stoic
encouragement of Wilson to make Francis willing to fulfill his shauri. There is one final
moment of tutelage just prior to the point where Wilson and the new Francis, the Francis
ready to act with dignity, head into the bush. This moment follows the pattern of all the
previous occurrences of sincere tutelage in that it takes place away from Margot, away
from nada. Wilson offers some advice on what to expect from the wounded bull and bluntly
states how difficult it will be to bring the bull down. Compared with his cowardice at
the lion incident, it is obvious from Francis' reaction that he is not the same person he
once was 35:
Macomber felt his heart pounding and his mouth was dry again, but it was excitement, not
fear. 
In the story's conclusion, Francis stands his ground firing as the bull charges him, only
to be shot with an elephant gun from behind by Margot, who watches from the car (an
interior, safe location where she risks nothing). Wilson finishes the shauri which
Francis and he had been partners on and then, standing over Macomber's ripped apart head
and body, coldly attacks Margot's malicious destruction of her husband: Why didn't you
just poison him? That's what they do in England. 36
The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber offers a dim hope for the cause of
self-betterment through the exercise of free will. Francis does attain the awareness he
strives for, but at the cost of wasting his entire (adult) life in the realm of nada
before realizing, through exposure to raw fear and danger, that he has no courage -- not
enough to stand up to a wounded lion, nor his wife, nor his own decrepit moral values of
money and Societal standing. Wilson helps Francis along the journey by providing a quiet
but compelling example of a man who has faced fear, faced nada, and overcome them. In the
end, though, the forces of determinism win out over Francis. If Francis is victorious, in
many ways he is a phyrric victor. He stands firing, happy and exhilarated, in an ultimate
act of free will and courage as the bull charges him, only to be shot in the back
(literally) by his wife, the representation of all that he has come to reject, the
representation of nada. Hemingway's message is quite clear: it is a hellish struggle to
make something of yourself in the modern world, and there are few things you can trust,
and you can never count on anything good lasting very long, and if you find something
worth holding on to you had better hold tightly because the rest of the world will try
like hell to ruin it for you, and the odds are in their favor. After Margot shoots
Francis even Wilson's biting, sarcastic attacks on her ultimately ring hollow in
comparison to the overwhelming sensation the reader gets that all of Francis' suffering,
indeed his entire life, was almost completely for naught. Hemingway's perfect little
title reveals the only part of Francis Macomber's life that really counted or mattered:
those short, happy moments of the buffalo hunt. Everything else was nada.
Notes List
(page numbers without an author are from the text of The Short Happy Life of Francis
Macomber)
1 Grebstein, p. 16
2 Grebstein, pp. 5-7
3 p. 21. Francis lies alone in bed the night after the lion incident consoling himself by
thinling of what he knows:
His wife had been through with him before but it never lasted. He was very wealthy, and
he would be much wealthier, and he knew she would not leave him ever now. That was one of
the few things that he really knew. He knew about that, about motor cycles -- that was
the earliest -- about motor cars, about duck-shooting, about fishing, trout, salmon and
big sea, about sex in books, many books, too many books, about all court games, about
dogs, not much about horses, about hanging on to his money, about most of the other
things his world dealt in, and about his wife not leaving him.
(italics added). All of these things mean nothing to Francis on the safari; none of them
give him any basis for courage. 
4 p. 6
5 p. 22. As proof of the canned experience nature of the safari, a Societal magazine in
New York had the following to report on the Macomber's trip:
They were adding more than a spice of adventure to their much envied and ever-enduring
Romance by a Safari in what was known as Darkest Africa . . .
6 p. 7
7 ibid.
8 p. 26
9 p. 26; p. 23 respectively
10 p. 7
11 Rovit, p. 60
12 p. 5
13 p. 18
14 p. 8
15 ibid.
16 p. 12
17 p. 8
18 previous three quotations in essay text, pp. 10-11
19 p. 11
20 p. 23
21 p. 24
22 p. 25
23 ibid.
24 p. 28
25 p. 29
26 p. 30
27 p. 29
28 p. 30
29 p. 31
30 ibid.
31 previous three quotations in essay text, p. 32
32 p. 33
33 p. 34
34 ibid.
35 p. 35
36 p. 37
Bibliography
Works Cited List
Grebstein, Sheldon Norman. The Structure of Hemingway's Short Stories. in Hemingway's
Craft. Southern Illinois University Press. Carbondale and Edwardsville.
Hemingway, Ernest. The Short Happy Life of Francis Macomber. in The Short Stories.
Scribner/Simon & Schuster, New York. 1995.
Rovit, Earl. Of Tutors and Tyros. in Ernest Hemingway. Twayne Publishers, Inc. New York.
Other Sources
Bruccoli, Matthew J. Conversations with Ernest Hemingway. University Press of
Mississippi. Jackson and London. 1986.
Hoffman, Steven K. 'Nada' and the Clean, Well-Lighted Place: The Unity of Hemingway's
Short Fiction. in Essays in Literature 6, no. 1. Spring, 1979.
Waldhorn, Arthur. Style. in A Reader's Guide to Ernest Hemingway. 

Use the Search box at the top to find Term Papers for Sale by keywords or browse Free Essays page by page
(sorted alphabetically by Essay Title):

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39
For college-level Term Papers, Essays, Research Papers and Book Reports, please go to the Term Papers for Sale Website


This Free Essays Web Site, is Copyright © 2008, Essay Express. All rights reserved.




Partner websites: Interior Decor Art :: Immigration Lawyer Toronto :: Laser Clinic Toronto :: Original Abstract Paintings :: Learn Violin in Thornhill :: Learn Violin in Toronto :: Buy used Yamaha piano in Toronto