FREE ESSAY ON DEATH PENALTY

DEATH PENALTY

Institutions
The main idea in this essay, I believe, is how institutions can be so complex with their
chain of laws, traditions, custom ideas that provide structure and order of political
life. Civilization evolves and changes, and crafted by people who would mold institutions
by their own ideology or philosophical view of politics. Political theorists, who writes
in a period of chaos and anarchy, and believes politics is a power game, and life is
reduced to avoid a pain and seek pleasure. Institutions are shaped by Social chaos, and
philosophical perspectives, with intellectual and moral characters of institutional
framework. Political institutions with their representatives are not necessarily the
sense of democracy. The definition of representative is that legislators and others are
elected in the public interest. Most political societies, the period includes the
abundant justification of for existence of goals, ideas and objectives of the nation. The
self- evident is our Declaration of Independence because it emanates from nature. 
Furthermore, the view of the framers political order depends on a person or a political
society conforming to law. The book that was written by Madison, Hamilton and jay called
the Federalists, using the pseudonym publius are references for the purposes of the
United States. And the principals reflected social ethics of society during the founding
period, and are manifested of the spiritual and the character intellectual of the
framers. Framers are just like artist, using their sculptured work (The American
Political System) were from raw materials, and experienced ideas from the past. the
circumstances from their time. The government construed by framers reflected the social
ethos of the culture and time. The American framers political philosophy reveals their
makeup and nature of their existence, and their imaginative view of politics. Then
publius argued that government is necessary, and human nature needs government, it being
a necessary item because; by rights human nature is flawed and it exist to preserve
liberty and freedom. It also ensures truths and institutionalization and preservation.
Defined by birth, wealth or privilege 
In-addition, federalism, checks, balances, separation of power, limited government,
judicial review and the American constitutional framework itself, are insights of framers
and are a product of their imagination, and makeup. American leaders not defined by
birth, wealth, or privilege. Institutions are tied to civilizations development. The
American Revolution struggled between political order opposing views. King George 111,
violated principals of government from natural law. Calling for independence apart from
natural rights, makes no sense, then if the king was a tyrant, he had no right to be a
ruling king. But according to colonists his rule was compatible to good government. In
our modern times, age, religion, culture and politics have competed for power and
influence.
Although, the complexity of institutions shapes peoples lives, and the way they live, and
are shaped by experiences and ideas. Institutions are viewed as impersonal very often,
and they contribute allegiance identity and create an environment which people experience
range of emotions, like love, happiness, friendship, and alienations to name a few. So
you either live a good life or experience misery. These concepts I am discussing undergo,
interpretation and re-interpretation as I have attempted to do. Hopefully I am
succeeding. As the surrounding social ethics changes, political institutions have
corresponding changes also, usually results from challenges of changing circumstances
that require new, or reformed institutions. The tyranny of George the 111, and his desire
for American independence created efforts to reshape the political institution of the
colonies. This gave rise in these United States, and then wasn't created in a historical
vacuum. 
Nevertheless, the rise of a nation and its founding time, or the fall of a nation its
decline, typically philosophers are compelled to answer questions about order and
institutions. Plato faced a break down of political order in Athens. He also emphasized
the need for statesmen, who could control political institutions, because in Athens the
leadership was corrupt and inept. Institutions structure changes occurs when leaders mold
characters, and people change or visa-versa. Plato said institutions don't determine
personal behavior, nor does behavior determine institutions. Aristotle's view of
institutions defined in his politics, he emphasized that a man is a social and political
animal. Families are a social institution as natural, and play a vital role in the
creation of political order. After Aristotle, Aquinas believed that the state was natural
and no real necessary evil.
In conclusion the complexity of political institutions are numbered more than people, and
the function within them are far more than the buildings that house them, having chains
of laws, ideas, traditions, and customs that build structure and order for political
life. Without them life would be impossible. The product of mans struggle for justice and
order, and as institutions evolve new changes to political order is acquired.